• Login
    View Item 
    •   TAMU-CC Repository Home
    • TAMU-CC Theses, Dissertations, and Graduate Projects
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   TAMU-CC Repository Home
    • TAMU-CC Theses, Dissertations, and Graduate Projects
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reef restoration facilitates habitat provisioning for oysters and motile epifauna

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Martinez_Meghan_Thesis.pdf (2.262Mb)
    Date Issued
    2019-12
    Author
    Martinez, Meghan Janessa
    ORCID
    0000-0003-1967-1018
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-1018
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/1969.6/87893
    Abstract
    Severe degradation of oyster reef habitat over the past century has led to associated losses in ecological and economic benefits. Common oyster reef restoration goals target replacement of lost ecosystem services, including habitat provision, by replacing the ecological functions of lost reef habitats. The goal of this study was to monitor development of faunal communities on a restored oyster reef in the Gulf of Mexico. In July 2017, more than 1 M tons of reclaimed oyster shell were used to restore 1.83 ha of oyster reef complex (~610 linear m) in St. Charles Bay, Texas. Oysters, epifauna, and infauna were sampled monthly for the first three months after construction, and then were sampled quarterly for a total of 19 months at the restored reef and nearby reference sites. Within the first three months after construction, mean oyster densities increased by more than three times, growth rates peaked at 0.41 mm d-1 , and the restored oyster population shifted from 100 % spat to more than 90 % submarket size oysters. Although Perkinsus marinus infection was detected on every sampling date on the reference reef, only a single infected oyster was observed on the restored reef. Reef location—away from infected source populations— and other hydrological factors such as current speed and direction, may have impeded disease development. Epifaunal density, biomass, and diversity, became similar to that of the reference reef within four months after construction, but a shift in epifaunal community assemblages occurred between the first and the second year after construction, indicating monitoring periods of more than one year are necessary to capture faunal community development on a restored reef. The structure provided by the restored reef was conducive to oyster and epifaunal community development and may have supported ecological resistance since minimal impacts to reef structure were observed in the wake of Hurricane Harvey. Infaunal density, diversity, and biomass did not differ between sites adjacent (less than 5 m) versus distant (~30 m) from the restored reef and were governed more by salinity than presence of the restored reef. The recruitment and densities of oysters indicate that the restored reef met proposed success metrics within 19 months after construction, and that restored reefs can successfully replace ecosystem services, such as habitat provision, lost due to degradation.
    Rights
    This material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with its source. All rights are reserved and retained regardless of current or future development or laws that may apply to fair use standards. Permission for publication of this material, in part or in full, must be secured with the author and/or publisher.
    Collections
    • College of Science and Engineering Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of TAMU-CC RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV