What are the favorable large-scale environments for the highest-flash-rate thunderstorms on earth?

Date

2020-05-01

Authors

Liu, Nana
Liu, Chuntao
Chen, Baohua
Zipser, Edward

ORCID

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AMS

Abstract

A 16-yr Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) convective feature (CF) dataset and ERA-Interim data are used to understand the favorable thermodynamic and kinematic environments for high-flash-rate thunderstorms globally as well as regionally. We find that intense thunderstorms, defined as having more than 50 lightning flashes within a CF during the ~90-s TRMM overpassing time share a few common thermodynamic features over various regions. These include large convective available potential energy (>1000 J kg−1), small to moderate convection inhibition (CIN), and abundant moisture convergence associated with low-level warm advection. However, each region has its own specific features. Generally, thunderstorms with high lightning flash rates have greater CAPE and wind shear than those with low flash rates, but the differences are much smaller in tropical regions than in subtropical regions. The magnitude of the low- to midtropospheric wind shear is greater over the subtropical regions, including the south-central United States, Argentina, and southwest of the Himalayas, than tropical regions, including central Africa, Colombia, and northwest Mexico, with the exception of Sahel region. Relatively, favorable environments of high-flash-rate thunderstorms in the tropical regions are characterized by higher CAPE, lower CIN, and weaker wind shear compared to the high-flash-rate thunderstorms in the subtropical regions, which have a moderate CAPE and CIN, and stronger low to midtropospheric wind shear.

Description

Keywords

large-scale motions, synoptic climatology, wind shear, cape

Sponsorship

Rights:

Citation

Liu, N., Liu, C., Chen, B. and Zipser, E., 2020. What are the favorable large-scale environments for the highest-flash-rate thunderstorms on Earth?. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 77(5), pp.1583-1612.