Ecological structure and function of restored habitats across a range of coastal environments

dc.contributor.advisorPollack, Jennifer Beseres
dc.contributor.authorRezek, Ryan Joseph
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLebreton, Benoit
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSterba-Boatwright, Blair
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStunz, Gregory W.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBridges, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T15:24:56Z
dc.date.available2018-02-06T15:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.description.abstractCoastal habitat loss represents a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services worldwide. Habitat restoration plays a key role in efforts to mitigate this loss by supporting the recovery of ecological communities (i.e., structure) and important ecosystem processes (i.e., functions). The objective of this dissertation was to evaluate the ability of constructed habitat restorations to support equivalent ecological communities and functions to reference habitats across a range of coastal environments. This was accomplished through an analytical framework combining community structure analysis with stable isotope based food web analysis. In Chapter I, the scale and implications of coastal degradation, the use of constructed habitats for coastal restoration, and the use of stable isotope analysis to study food webs and function are outlined. In Chapter II, the development of a constructed subtidal oyster reef in the Mission-Aransas estuary was surveyed alongside a natural oyster reef over a 5- to 29-month post-restoration timeframe to evaluate recovery. The results demonstrated structural and functional recovery occurring between 12-15 months post-restoration, as oysters and predatory consumers increasingly colonized the developing reef. In Chapter III, a constructed salt marsh was monitored alongside a natural reference marsh in Nueces Bay over a 4- to 6-year post-restoration timeframe. The results of this study demonstrated the ability of the restored marsh to support communities with similar composition as the natural marsh, however, stable isotope mixing models demonstrated that dominant macrofauna in the restored marsh consumed less organic matter originating from macrophyte production than their natural counterparts. This functional variation was attributed to the relatively low amounts of organic matter and detritus contained in the recently constructed salt marsh sediments. In Chapter IV, I examined the epibenthic community and food web structure of subsurface “Rigs-to-Reefs” artificial reefs in comparison to standing operational platforms in the Texas offshore Gulf of Mexico shelf region. Reefed platforms were found to support similar communities as standing platform habitats at similar depths (30-m), however shallow standing platform sites (5-m) were found to support communities that were distinct from deeper standing platform and clearance-limited reefed platform sites. Reefed platform and standing platforms at 5- and 30-m depths were found to support similar food web structure, indicating that reefed platforms replicate the fundamental ecological functions associated with standing platforms. Although, the loss of shallow water substrate, associated with platform reefing, could be expected to reduce the biodiversity associated with these structures. In Chapter V, I conclude with a summary of the findings in this dissertation and outline general patterns of functional recovery between different coastal habitat types that can be inferred from these results and established theory. This study provides strong evidence for the ability of constructed habitats to support similar communities as natural/pre-existing habitats across a range of coastal environments. The results suggest that constructed habitats in systems driven by microalgal producers are likely to functionally recover as community structure develops. However, functional recovery in systems driven by vascular plant production are limited by the recovery of detrital food web intermediaries. The insights obtained from this study have broad implications for coastal restoration practitioners and resource managers.en_US
dc.description.collegeCollege of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.description.departmentPhysical and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.format.extent157 pagesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.6/19200
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with its source. All rights are reserved and retained regardless of current or future development or laws that may apply to fair use standards. Permission for publication of this material, in part or in full, must be secured with the author and/or publisher.en_US
dc.subjectCoastal System Scienceen_US
dc.subjectestuaryen_US
dc.subjectfood weben_US
dc.subjectmarine biologyen_US
dc.subjectRestoration Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectstable isotopeen_US
dc.titleEcological structure and function of restored habitats across a range of coastal environmentsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genreDissertationen_US
dcterms.typeText
thesis.degree.disciplineCoastal and Marine System Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M University--Corpus Christien_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rezek_Ryan_dissertation.pdf
Size:
4.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: