Interruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasks

dc.contributor.authorLee, Byung Cheol
dc.contributor.authorChung, Kwanghun
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung-Hee
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-0970en_US
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-6091en_US
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-0970
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-6091
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-0970
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-6091https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-0970
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-6091
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-28T18:12:11Z
dc.date.available2021-10-28T18:12:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-30
dc.description.abstractInterruption is a widespread phenomenon in human–computer interaction in modern working environments. To minimize the adverse impact or to maximize possible benefits of interruptions, a reliable approach to evaluate interruption cost needs to be established. In this paper, we suggest a new approach to evaluate the interruption cost by cognitive workload and task performance measures. The cognitive workload is assessed by pupil diameter changes and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index. Task performance includes task completion time and task accuracy in a series of controlled laboratory experiments. This integrated approach was applied to three interruption coordination modes (i.e., the immediate, the negotiated, and the scheduled modes), which were designed based on McFarlane’s interruption coordination modes. Each mode consists of cognitive and skill tasks depending on the degree of mental demands providing four different task sets of interruptive task environments. Our results demonstrate that the negotiated mode shows a lower interruption cost than other modes, and primary task type and task similarity between primary and peripheral tasks are crucial in the evaluation of the cost. This study suggests a new approach evaluating interruption cost by cognitive workload and task performance measures. Applying this approach to various interruptive environments, disruptiveness of interruption was evaluated considering interruption coordination modes and task types, and the outcomes can support development of strategies to reduce the detrimental effects of unexpected and unnecessary interruptions.en_US
dc.description.abstractInterruption is a widespread phenomenon in human–computer interaction in modern working environments. To minimize the adverse impact or to maximize possible benefits of interruptions, a reliable approach to evaluate interruption cost needs to be established. In this paper, we suggest a new approach to evaluate the interruption cost by cognitive workload and task performance measures. The cognitive workload is assessed by pupil diameter changes and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index. Task performance includes task completion time and task accuracy in a series of controlled laboratory experiments. This integrated approach was applied to three interruption coordination modes (i.e., the immediate, the negotiated, and the scheduled modes), which were designed based on McFarlane’s interruption coordination modes. Each mode consists of cognitive and skill tasks depending on the degree of mental demands providing four different task sets of interruptive task environments. Our results demonstrate that the negotiated mode shows a lower interruption cost than other modes, and primary task type and task similarity between primary and peripheral tasks are crucial in the evaluation of the cost. This study suggests a new approach evaluating interruption cost by cognitive workload and task performance measures. Applying this approach to various interruptive environments, disruptiveness of interruption was evaluated considering interruption coordination modes and task types, and the outcomes can support development of strategies to reduce the detrimental effects of unexpected and unnecessary interruptions.
dc.identifier.citationLee, B.C., Chung, K. and Kim, S.H., 2018. Interruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasks. Applied Sciences, 8(10), p.1780.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, B.C., Chung, K. and Kim, S.H., 2018. Interruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasks. Applied Sciences, 8(10), p.1780.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app8101780
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.6/89912
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjecthuman-computer interactionen_US
dc.subjectinterruption costen_US
dc.subjectinterruption coordinationen_US
dc.subjectinterruption coordination modeen_US
dc.subjecttask typeen_US
dc.subjectcognitive workloaden_US
dc.subjecttask performanceen_US
dc.subjecthuman-computer interaction
dc.subjectinterruption cost
dc.subjectinterruption coordination
dc.subjectinterruption coordination mode
dc.subjecttask type
dc.subjectcognitive workload
dc.subjecttask performance
dc.titleInterruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasksen_US
dc.titleInterruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasks
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lee_Byung Cheol_AppliedScience.pdf
Size:
1.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: