Paging the clinical informatics community: Respond STAT to Dobbs v. Jackson's Women's Health Organization
Date
2023-03-01
Authors
Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone
Ravi, Akshay
Weia, Benjamin
Aarts, Jos
Ahmad, Hasan B.
Araj, Ellen
Bauml, Julie A.
Benham-Hutchins, Marge
Boyd, Andrew D.
Brecht-Doscher, Aimee
ORCID
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
If the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was a wake-up call that clinical informatics and digital health play vital roles in our future, the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs)[1] is a blaring alarm. Dobbs, which overturned Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, allows states to individually regulate access to abortion. This ruling has triggered the enforcement of existing state laws that ban or restrict abortion and efforts to pass similar new laws.
Description
Keywords
COVID-19, coronavirus, pregnancy, abortion, medical care
Sponsorship
Rights:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Citation
Arvisais-Anhalt, S., Benham-Hutchins, M., et al. (2023, March 1). Paging the Clinical Informatics Community: Respond STAT to Dobbs v. Jackson's Women's Health Organization. Applied Clinical Informatics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2000-7590