A comparative analysis of marine mammal tracheas

Date

2014-04-01

Authors

Moore, Colby D.
Moore, Michael
Trumble, Stephen
Niemeyer, Misty
Lentell, Betty
McLellan, William
Costidis, Alexander
Fahlman, Andreas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Company Of Biologists

Abstract

In 1940, Scholander suggested that stiffened upper airways remained open and received air from highly compressible alveoli during marine mammal diving. There are few data available on the structural and functional adaptations of the marine mammal respiratory system. The aim of this research was to investigate the anatomical (gross) and structural (compliance) characteristics of excised marine mammal tracheas. Here, we defined different types of tracheal structures, categorizing pinniped tracheas by varying degrees of continuity of cartilage (categories 1–4) and cetacean tracheas by varying compliance values (categories 5A and 5B). Some tracheas fell into more than one category along their length; for example, the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) demonstrated complete rings cranially, and as the trachea progressed caudally, tracheal rings changed morphology. Dolphins and porpoises had less stiff, more compliant spiraling rings while beaked whales had very stiff, less compliant spiraling rings. The pressure–volume (P–V) relationships of isolated tracheas from different species were measured to assess structural differences between species. These findings lend evidence for pressure-induced collapse and re-inflation of lungs, perhaps influencing variability in dive depth or ventilation rates of the species investigated.

Description

Keywords

diving, lung collapse, pressure–volume, compliance, diving physiology, alveolar compression

Sponsorship

This project was supported by a grant from the Office of Naval Research [grant number N00014-10-1-0059].

Rights:

Citation

Moore, C., Moore, M., Trumble, S., Niemeyer, M., Lentell, B., McLellan, W., Costidis, A. and Fahlman, A., 2014. A comparative analysis of marine mammal tracheas. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(7), pp.1154-1166.